The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later. Citations per year. Duplicate citations. The following articles are merged in Scholar. Their combined citations are counted only for the first article.
|Published (Last):||21 May 2008|
|PDF File Size:||5.40 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.62 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Skip to content. Skip to navigation. We all want our learning and revision to be effective. But how do we ensure that it is? We are now beginning to find out what works well and not so well when it comes to learning. John Dunlosky from Kent State University in the United States and colleagues carried out a meta study evaluating ten popular learning techniques Dunlosky et al.
Here's what they found. In order to receive a high utility rating, the technique needed to be useful in a range of conditions, for a range of learner ages and levels of prior knowledge. Two techniques came out as clear winners: practice testing and distributed practice.
Practice testing refers to any form of testing for learning which a student is able to do on their own. Examples of this technique include practising recall through flash cards, or completing practice problems or tests. Practice is likely to improve learning via a variety of direct and mediated effects - for a further analysis of these, take a look at the paper.
The authors also reviewed the dosage - how many practice tests should be taken, and the timing of these. The other technique which received a high utility rating from the authors, and links to the previous point about spacing out practice tests, was distributed practice.
Distributed practice refers to distributing the learning over time - in other words, not cramming. The authors cite a number of studies which found that time lags between learning episodes boost learning, despite the fact that people might initially forget more of the material between the individual sessions.
So in this case the advice is simple. Start early and ensure that you revisit and review the material you have already revised. Eight other techniques were reviewed by the authors. Two related study methods which were found to work well were elaborative interrogation and self explanation. Elaborative interrogation is a complex name for a simple concept - asking yourself why something is the way it is or a particular concept or fact is true, and providing the answer.
Self-explanation refers to a similar process, where the explanation might take the form of answering why but also other questions, as well as relating new information to information which is already known.
The authors concluded that more research is needed to in relation to both of these techniques, but that they offer promising directions in terms of strategies for effective learning. Another method which the authors looked at is called interleaved practice. This refers to studying different topics or problem types within a single study session. So, is this a good idea, or is blocking the type of study that you do or types of questions you address within a single session more effective?
Dunlosky and colleagues concluded that results of studies have been mixed. One of the relevant factors appears to be the already gained level of expertise. If you are just starting out with a particular type of problem, blocking might provide you with the space to get to grips with a particular topic.
Interleaving different topics, questions or problems might subsequently provide you with more integrated practice to boost learning in the later stages. Producing text summaries is likely to involve the reading and comprehension of a text, as well as the ability to identify the most important information within it and to encapsulate it briefly in your own words. Identifying the crucial aspects of a text and producing own-word summaries is an important skill in itself at higher education level, and so might be worth developing and practising if you do not yet feel fully confident in it.
Summarising might also form the first stage of a learning process, with other techniques such as self-testing and self-explanation used subsequently for review purposes. Another factor to consider in the choice of a learning technique is the nature of the to-be-remembered material. The authors found that highlighting tended to work better for students who were more adept at identifying the crucial to-be-remembered aspects of a text.
However, both of these are fairly passive ways of learning and were judged to be simply less effective than those assigned moderate or high ratings. So, where does this leave us? What conclusions should we draw and, more importantly, what learning and revision techniques should we actually use? The authors of this study examined the techniques in isolation, but there is nothing stopping you combining a number of them within your learning.
Good luck! Dunlosky, J. Email: studyhelp if you are a University of Leicester student please use your University email address. Revision and exam skills. Organising your time. All of our study guides are licensed under the Creative Commons. Personal tools Web Editor Log in. Search Site only in current section.
Advanced Search…. Search Site. This study guide provides a summary of the findings of a meta study which looked at the effectiveness of different learning techniques. Practice over time In order to receive a high utility rating, the technique needed to be useful in a range of conditions, for a range of learner ages and levels of prior knowledge.
Share this page:. Navigation Academic Skills Centre. Contact the Academic Skills Centre Email: studyhelp if you are a University of Leicester student please use your University email address. Further resources Related study guides you may find useful: Revision and exam skills Organising your time.
Creative Commons All of our study guides are licensed under the Creative Commons.
Does Dr. My research program has focused on understanding three inter-related components of self-regulated learning: 1 monitoring of learning, 2 control of study time, and 3 the application of strategies during learning. These three components of learning fall under the rubric of metacognition, which concerns people's cognition or beliefs about their cognitions. By studying metacognition in students across the life span, a major goal of all facets of my research involves developing techniques to improve student learning and achievement across multiple domains. Dunlosky, J. Psychological Science in the Public Interest , 14 , Bjork, R.
An overview of learning and revision techniques