Hieronder vind je twee keer een voorbeeld van een discussie uit een WO master scriptie ter inspiratie om jouw dicussie te schrijven. Je kunt hier de opbouw zien maar ook hoe de hypotheses worden besproken en voorbeeldzinnen. Zie ook onze pagina tips bij het schrijven van je discussie voor meer inspiratie. Wij wensen je alvast heel veel succes bij het schrijven van je discussie! Het eerste voorbeeld is een master klinische psychologie, cijfer 8.

Author:Vit Fetaxe
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):25 November 2015
PDF File Size:5.68 Mb
ePub File Size:20.98 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Wij maken je document leesbaar en verbeteren de taalfouten direct in je document via Wijzigingen Bijhouden in Word. Daarnaast geeft de editor je suggesties en tips in opmerkingen in de kantlijn. In the study by Martynova and Renneboog it already became clear found that shareholder protection was almost equal between the US and the Netherlands in both countries. At least one More than 1 hedge fund acquired a share in 14 the company in fourteen of the 36 listed companies in my database.

Of these, 10 of those were working together to achieve certain goals. Although Brav et al. Due to the fact that Because shareholders have an opportunity to go to the OK , they have a fair reasonable chance of getting having their demands fulfilled. The OK likes prefers to solve disputes between shareholders and management by taking enacting provisional measures that improve the dialogue between the two parties.

As a consequence , the parties often find compromises. This is a simple way to make your writing clearer and more compelling. Please make this relationship more apparent. Reviewing your linking word choices may help you here. I enjoyed reading and editing your thesis. I found your topic very interesting! These suggestions are intended to help you become a better writer.

I hope you find my comments helpful as you finalize your thesis. Good luck accepting all the changes! Despite what the Utility Maximization Model utility maximization model suggests, people do not always act in their own self-interest—a significant finding in Behavioral Economics behavioral economics.

Read more. Apostrophes should not be used to make plurals. This also applies to abbreviations, acronyms and decades. Academic writing is generally more formal than other kinds of writing—avoid casual, everyday language and slang. A lot of Many studies have tried to find out determine why we remember certain photos photographs but not others.

If one or two words can take the place of several, choose the shorter option. In the year of , the researchers interviewed a total of 75 individuals in order to better understand the concept of platform-based work. An acronym should not start a sentence, as this is typically considered too informal. Either revise the sentence so that the acronym no longer comes first, or spell out the full term. NGOs Non-governmental organizations provided their input during the planning phase.

In het Verbeterrapport of Most Common Mistakes staan jouw belangrijkste aandachtspunten op het vlak van taal en academisch schrijven op een rij.

Zo helpen we je op weg om in de toekomst beter te schrijven. Daarnaast ontvang je een Structuurrapport waarin je informatie vindt over de indeling in hoofdstukken en paragrafen. In het rapport staan alle onderdelen en elementen die nog ontbreken of op de verkeerde plek in het document staan. Je krijgt hierbij altijd een link naar een van onze uitgebreide artikelen die je kunnen helpen om het probleem op te lossen.

Consider writing an abstract to give readers a concise summary of your research and to help potential readers to decide whether to read the full paper.

Read more Literature review: Transitions between sections Revise Consider introducing transitions to bridge the individual paragraphs of your document. This approach will make it easier for the reader to grasp how each new paragraph fits into your discussion, which will make your writing more cohesive and therefore more compelling overall. In most cases, there is no need to re-review the methods or other elements of the research in the results chapter.

Discussion: Interpretation of results Add The discussion is the place to interpret the results. In this section, you might consider whether and how the results support the literature, address the implications of the results, and generally explore the contribution of the research in more detail. Read more Conclusion Shorten A conclusion section is usually relatively short and to the point. It seems like you may have included some unnecessary details in this section.

Read more Rode Draad Check Als je de Rode Draad Check hebt aangevraagd, vult de editor twee checklists in waarmee je tekst op logica en duidelijkheid wordt gecontroleerd.

De editor geeft ook advies om de duidelijkheid van je tekst te kunnen verbeteren in opmerkingen in de kantlijn van je document. Feedback editor: Your paper has a clear trajectory with a beginning, middle and end. Nice work! Feedback editor: You talk about 50 people who disagree with the current political situation, but you do not specify the sources that substantiate this claim. I also recommend that you look at your statement that democracy is the best form of government. Feedback editor: Remember that your readers haven't studied this topic as much as you have.

Be sure to give them the information they need to understand your arguments. In addition, I recommend elaborating on the related studies, so your readers have a proper framework for understanding your research. Feedback editor: In Section 4. However, in your conclusion, you say that three respondents had no opinion.

Be sure to reconcile these points or make corrections if necessary. Feedback editor: Yes, absolutely. However, you have included more than enough examples to make your point. In the comments, I've highlighted examples that you might consider deleting to keep your paper focused and concise. Feedback editor: You might consider adding more historical background information in Section 3. At present, that discussion implies a high level of background information on the part of readers. Feedback editor: Your goal is clear in principle, but only after reading the entire text.

I recommend making this clearer earlier on. You can do so by explaining the factors that led you to form your your hypothesis that democracy always leads to demagogy in the Introduction chapter.

Feedback editor: Although I understand what you want to say, you have not specifically stated what the final conclusion of your text is. You should therefore take a careful look at my comment on page Feedback editor: Yes. Kom je ergens niet uit? De Scribbr Plagiaat Checker maakt gebruik van de plagiaatsoftware en databases van Turnitin. Turnitin is marktleider op het gebied van plagiaatdetectie en wordt ook door veel onderwijsinstellingen gebruikt.

Scribbr is gespecialiseerd in het controleren van studiegerelateerde documenten mbo, hbo, wo en postdoc. We kijken de volgende soorten teksten na:. Prijs berekenen. Alle diensten Onze editors Ervaringen Uploaden. Home Nakijkservice Thesis nakijken Voorbeeld nakijken Engelse thesis. Sarah Scribbr-editor. Dear Wendy, I enjoyed reading and editing your thesis.

Word-level grammatical and spelling mistakes You used a mix of British and American English spelling throughout your thesis. Consistency is important, especially in academic writing.

Sentence-level grammatical mistakes Long and complicated sentences can often be difficult for the reader to follow. In such cases, consider breaking the sentences into two or introducing punctuation to make them more readable.

Style and academic tone In academic writing, acronyms should be defined upon first use so that the reader can easily follow along.

Cheers, Sarah. Abstract Add Consider writing an abstract to give readers a concise summary of your research and to help potential readers to decide whether to read the full paper. The text has a logical beginning, middle and end. The argumentation makes sense. The information is presented in a logical order. The information seems valid and reliable based on the argumentation.

The text does not contain any unintentionally contradictory information or arguments. No information that is relevant for further understanding of the text seems to be missing. The examples used are relevant. You take into account that the reader might not know everything about this topic. The subject of the document is clear. The purpose of the document is clear. The most important question to be answered in the document is clear. The answer to the above question, namely the conclusion, is clear.

The methods used to arrive at this answer are clear. Terms are explained in a clear and precise manner. Klaar voor een Engelse thesis zonder taalfouten?

Vraag het ons Kom je ergens niet uit? Start een live chat E-mail info scribbr. Veelgestelde vragen Bekijk ze allemaal.


Voorbeeld Trekkrachtrapport



Voorbeeld Adviesrapport


Related Articles